MTK6592 vs Qualcomm Battery Efficiency Images!

mtl6592 Here we have some recent images showing the power efficiency of MT6592. They are touting MTK6592 as being 40% more efficient than the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800. The ARM Cortex A7 is indeed very efficient, and actually ARM says “The ARM Cortex™-A7 MPCore™ processor is the most efficient application processor ARM has ever developed”. A bold statement, but you don’t see them saying this about any of their other architectures, so let’s take them at their word.mtk-6592

On one hand it’s a bit disappointing that MTK6592 didn’t decide to go with a big.LITTLE configuration. This is exactly what Cortex A7 was designed for – working in tandem with Cortex A15. However, there are a couple points worth noting:

  • power wise, there should be no concerns about running Android very smoothly. Octa-core MT6592 with Cortex A7 is more than enough to handle the regular CPU stresses you’re likely to throw at it. The only area it may falter against the competition is in areas such as video processing or other extreme CPU intensive tasks. Normal and even power users needing more than what this SoC offers.
  • the GPU will be handling the overwhelming share of the graphics work load. In ancient Android MediaTek times (circa 2010), MTK CPUs did all the work. There was no GPU to help with the specific tasks that games and graphics intensive apps brought.  Luckily we’re in 2013 and graphics intensive operations will be handled by the more than capable Mali450-MP4.
  • costs are another thing to consider. Most of us are going with China brand phones not only because they’re so cool, but because the offer great bang for the buck. Licensing of ARM big.LITTLE technology is pricier than licensing Cortex A7 alone.

I’ll be exploring the first point more in an upcoming post.

Comments

3 responses to “MTK6592 vs Qualcomm Battery Efficiency Images!”

  1. Rdmkr Avatar
    Rdmkr

    I wish I agreed with you that cortex A7 can handle android without any trouble, but I often don’t find that to be the case with quad-core mediatek phones. Basic menu screens often still show stutters and lags on the 1.2 and 1.5 Ghz quad-cores I’ve seen. I kinda doubt this is the kind of problem that more CPU cores solves, or a boost from 1.5 to 1.7 or 2 ghz for that matter. Maybe the GPU will. But the main problem seems to be the inconsistency of the CPU’s performance; it’s inability to deliver performance when you need it most – I think a consequence of cortex A7’s in-order based architecture. This is my main annoyance with the chipset and a hurdle for mediatek to overcome.

    It’s possible I’ve just been buying the wrong mediatek phones, but it’s something I’ve heard other people complain about; people who have had a lot of mtk phones of a broad variety of brands…

    I don’t doubt this chip will surprise us with its high performance and cost-effectiveness in many ways, but at this point I don’t think it’s a real competitor to high end snapdragons. I hope to be proven wrong, of course.

    1. Damian Parsons Avatar
      Damian Parsons

      We’ll have to agree to disagree. My experience has been the opposite. MTK6589 handled Android with zero problems and smooth as butter. In my experience, CPU isn’t the bottleneck. It’s eMMC/SD read/write, and RAM running out which forces reloads from cache that usually cause slow downs. I do wish that they’d gone with big.LITTLE. Or perhaps came out with 2 different lines – a big.LITTLE version for premium phones, and MTK6592 as it is now, but alas it’s not to be. Don’t expect the world, and you’ll be more than happy – remember that MT6592 isn’t supposed to be a high-end SoC. It’s a mid-range SoC, and it covers that area just fine.

      1. Sagia86 Avatar
        Sagia86

        What china phone brand you usually use Damian?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *